![]() Further research should be directed towards determining the clinical significance of the differences in image quality reported in this study. Conclusions: None of the sensors was considered to generate images of significantly better quality than the other sensors tested. Other comparisons resulted in non-significant results. The Image Works sensor image was rated the lowest by all clinicians. Results: The Dexis sensor was ranked significantly better than Sirona and Carestream-Kodak sensors and the image captured using the Carestream-Kodak sensor was ranked significantly worse than those captured using Dexis, Schick and Cyber Medical Imaging sensors. Minimal Investment Preserve your capital and credit with no headaches. ![]() A Subscription Service for Sensors 1999 one time fee and 139/mo. Analytical methods used to evaluate clinical image quality included the Visual Grading Characteristics method, which helps to quantify subjective opinions to make them suitable for analysis. Guaranteed Compatibility works directly in all major imaging software. Methods: Eighteen clinicians ranked the quality of a bitewing acquired from one subject using eight different intraoral sensors. ![]() Purpose: To evaluate the image quality generated by eight commercially available intraoral sensors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |